![]() |
|
|
ABOUT DR. BRANDY
His CredentialsPublished Articles Lectures Recent News Patient Testimonials Doctor Testimonials Your Evaluation How to Select a Doctor Why Choose Dr. Brandy The Brandy School Home
![]()
|
A Method for Evaluating and Treating the Temporal Peak Region in Patients with Male Pattern BaldnessDermatologic Surgery Vol. 28, pp. 394-401, 2002 Introduction | Norwood Studies | Grading System | Surgical Technique | Discussion | Summary | References | Commentary Dominic A. Brandy, M.D.- Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. BACKGROUND. In the past, hair restoration surgeons have focused most of their attention and efforts on the reconstruction of the hairline region and the area on top of the head. However, little attention has been given to the temporal peaks and the areas immediately posterior to them.OBJECTIVE. The goals of this article are to describe the pattern baldness process at the temporal peaks and the region immediately posterior to them, and to describe a method for the evaluation and treatment of these very important and often neglected areas. METHODS. A method for evaluating and grading the temporal peak region is given. A surgical technique for treating this problem is described. This method consists of making 1.0 mm spear blade incisions at a very acute 10° angle in the newly designed anterior peak and in between the hair follicles that remain in the are a posterior to the peak. The grafting of the finest onehaired grafts available in between existing hair follicles is accomplished with the help of 3.5 X expandable loupes. The anterior temporal peak design is coordinated with the position of the frontal hairline restoration; the more anterior the hairline, the more anterior the temporal peak and vice-versa. RESULTS. The results of evaluating the temporal peak areas and treating them appropriately have consistently restored the cosmetic harmony between the frontal hairline and the temporal peak region. It is important, however, to only utilize the finest hairs available to create an aesthetically pleasing result. CONCLUSION. When evaluating patients for hair restoration surgery, it should be a common practice to evaluate the temporal peak regions and the areas immediately posterior to them. These areas should be appropriately treated so that the frontal hair restoration coordinates with that of the temporal peak. The further anterior one comes with the hairline, the more anterior must come with the temporal peak restoration and vice-versa. IN 1949 Dr. John Hamilton1 published an article that demonstrated conclusively that the extent and development of male pattern baldness was dependent on the interaction of three factors: androgens, genetic predisposition, and age. Shortly thereafter, in 1951 he published another article that determined the incidence and degree of male pattern baldness in 1000 men at various ages.2 In this article, he described male pattern baldness evolving from a Type 1 (no signs of baldness) to an extensively bald Type VII individual. Norwood3 subsequently went on to further delineate the states of baldness (Figure 1) and described the process as follows: TYPE I: There is no recession or very minimal recession at the frontotemporal region.
NORWOOD STUDIESNorwood studied 1000 men divided into age groups, examining and classifying according to the Hamilton classification. The results of his study demonstrated that the incidence of Types III, IV, V, VI and VII increased steadily as the individuals aged (Figure 2). The prevalence of more advanced male pattern baldness (Type V, VI, and VII) remained relatively low until individuals reached the seventh, eighth or ninth decade of their lives. It was noted that when Norwood's study was compared to a similar study performed by Hamilton many years prior the figures were amazingly similar, but Hamilton's percentages were consistently higher by 20-30% (Figure 3).
In both of these studies, the process primarily described was the evolution of what was occurring at the top of the head. In neither description is there mention of the gradual recession of the temporal peaks (the triangular tufts of hair that project into the lateral forehead region) and the area immediately posterior to them. Therefore, the thrust of this article is to describe the gradual, thinning process of this very important region and to demonstrate a technique to effectively treat it. A SYSTEM FOR GRADING TEMPORAL PEAK BALDNESSGrade A Temporal Peak BaldnessThe temporal peaks can be described as little triangular tufts of hair projecting into the lateral forehead regions bilaterally. With grade A the temporal peak region demonstrates hair that is vibrant with no signs of thinning (Figure 4). When thoroughly wetting the area with alcohol or water, there are no demonstrated signs of thinning at or behind the peak.
Grade B Temporal Peak Baldness Grade C Temporal Peak Baldness
Grade D Temporal Peak Baldness Importance of the Temporal Peaks Because of this important relationship between the top of the head and the temporal peaks and because the vast majority of hair restoration surgeons ignore this region, the author describes a technique for evaluating and rejuvenating the temporal peak areas with surgical technology. Scribing Technique for Temporal Peak Restoration
The frontal hairline is first scribed with a surgical marker. Once the frontal hairline is completed, the areas of the temporal peaks can be scribed. The temporal peak drawing can easily be done by using 3.5X expandable field loupes and studying the vellus hair in the region. The old temporal peak is simply reconstructed from the vellus hair pattern existing at the region. In many patients the surgeon may want to move the temporal peak a bit posteriorly, from where it was previously, to coordinate with the placement of the frontal hairline. The more conservative the frontal hairline placement, the more conservative should be the temporal peak placement. Once the peak is scribed, a line is drawn superiorly to meet the frontal hairline and an angle is formed at the temporal recession. The author usually softens the temporal recession angle with one-haired grafts as seen by the rounded line on the photograph (Figure 8). Once one temporal peak drawing is completed, it is critical to measure the height of this new temporal peak high point in relationship to the eyebrow (Figure 9). After this is performed, this same measurement, in centimeters, should be carried over to the other side. This is one of the most important aspects of the technique because it is very easy to create asymmetry. Thus, it is critical to step back from the patient and look at the high points of the temporal peaks to make certain that there is relative symmetry. Upon completion of scribing the temporal peaks, the areas of future posterior hair loss, the donor site and the frontal hairline, it is time to begin the surgical procedure. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR FOR TEMPORAL PEAK RESTORATIONAfter reviewing the proposed strategy and the consent form, the patient signs the form and is administered 20 mg of diazepam and 2 oxycodone tablets orally. An injection of miadazolem (.07 mg/kg) is subsequently administered intramuscularly.The patient is then taken to the operatory and made to lie prone into a Pron Pillo. It is important that a portion of the donor site be taken from an area where hair is not coarse. The donor site is then field blocked using a combination of 1 % lidocaine hydrochloride with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine and 1/4% bupivicaine. An elliptical donor strip is then excised away with a #10 Bard Parker blade (BD Medical Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The area is sutured with 2.5X magnification using a 0-PDS II in the galea and a 4-0 chromic suture cutaneously. The surgical assistants take the donor strip and excise away the finest one-haired follicular units possible. This is done with the help of a 10X stereoscopic microscope. The patient is now turned in the supine position and a field block is performed anterior to the hairline and temporal peaks and posterior to the line demarcating the extent of possible posterior progression of the temporal peaks. In this area, dots 1 cm apart are made with the surgical marker. The author injects 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine into the dots with a 30-gauge needle, waits five minutes, then injects 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with 1 100,000 epinephrine in between the dots. Bupivicaine in. a 1/4% strength is injected in behind the field block for longer-lasting effects. A very superficial tumescence is then performed to the temporal regions with 1 300,000 epinephrine through a 25 gauge needle. This should be performed superficially as to avoid the supertemporal artery and its posterior branch. At this point in the procedure, it is extremely important for the surgeon to use loupe magnification, preferably 3.SX strength with an expandable field.4 This magnification strength is most critical in those patients with early thinning of the temporal peak because the goal is to make tiny 1.0 mm incisions in between the existing hair follicles with a 1.0-mm spear blade (Ellis Instruments, Madison, New Jersey). Normally, the author starts at the most inferior area of the temporal peak then works superiorly so that blood does not obscure the field (as- would happen if one started superiorly and worked inferiorly). The most important aspect of the incisional technique is to make sure the blade is pointed superiorly at an extreme angle. The surgeon should lay the dorsum of the hand on the cheek, which will allow him or she to push the blade at a 10° or less angle (Figure 10). There is no question that the proper positioning of the hand is by far the most important aspect of the surgical technique. If the incision is made at a steeper angle, the aesthetic result will be unacceptable to the patient because the hairs will stick out of the head instead of shingling in a downward fashion. It is critical to follow the same anterior-posterior direction of the existing or vellus hair that is remaining in the treated areas. The author normally makes approximately 20 incisions per square centimeter, which will achieve a density of 20 hairs per square centimeter throughout the temporal peak. If further sessions are performed, these areas can be further treated depending on whether the aesthetics are satisfactory after one session. Once the incisions have been made in between the existing hair follicles and into the newly designed temporal peaks, the insertion of the grafts is performed. It is critical that only one-haired follicular units be placed into this area and these grafts should preferably be the finest hairs of the donor harvest. If an individual has coarse hair, it is prudent to take the donor strip from the upper nape hair, where fine, permanent hairs can usually be harvested without creating noticeable scarring. If there is only coarse hair and no fine hair, it may be prudent not to perform temporal peak restoration and just keep the frontal hairline higher to coordinate with the existing temporal peaks. The individual placing the graft should use at least 2.SX loupe magnification so that increased accuracy and less trauma to the graft is availed to the patient. Upon completion of all of the grafts being placed, a circumferential dressing is placed on the head. The following day the dressing is removed and the patient's head is washed.
DISCUSSIONThe author has been practicing hair restoration surgery for over 20 years and therefore has had the opportunity to see patients' results degenerate somewhat with age. As has been mentioned throughout this article, one area that breaks down dramatically with age, and unfortunately was not routinely evaluated by the author, was the temporal peak region. These patients had exceptional results 15-20 years ago, but gradually took on an appearance similar to an individual who wears a hairpiece (hair at the top of the head with little or no hair at the temporal peak areas).The key to preventing this aesthetically unpleasing disharmony from occurring is to take one of two approaches. The first approach is to never graft the temporal peaks and routinely keep the hairline extremely high. Conversely, if the surgeon is reconstructing the hairline so that the distance from the hairline to the eyebrows is approximately one third of the face,5 the temporal peak areas should be evaluated and most likely treated with one-haired follicular units. The further the hairline is moved anteriorly, the further the temporal peak should be moved anteriorly and vice-versa. If no fine hair can be found in the donor area, it may be prudent to keep the frontal hairline high and not reconstruct the temporal peaks at all. In general, if the frontal edge of the hairline is placed approximately 0-4 cm in front of a line drawn in a coronal plane between the external auditory meatus, there is no need for temporal peak reconstruction (Figure 11). If, however, the hairline is placed up to approximately 4-6 cm anterior to a line drawn in a coronal plane between the external auditory meatus, the temporal peaks should be reconstructed to half the distance to where they were at youth, which is determined by the vellus hair pattern (Figure 12).
Conversely, if the hairline is placed from approximately 6 cm to 8 cm anterior to a line drawn in a coronal plane, between the external auditory meatus, the temporal peaks should be fully reconstructed (Figure 13). The frontal edge of the hairline should never exceed a point where the face is divided into thirds.5 When performing these reconstructions, the author averages 20 incisions per square centimeter and has found the density to be satisfactory in most patients due to the shingling effect of the overlapping hair shafts. If additional sessions are performed on top of the head, this address can be further enhanced if further density is required.
If hair restoration surgeons start evaluating on their previous patients the relationship of the temporal peaks to the frontal hairline, it can almost be guaranteed that a definite cosmetic disharmony will be noted in many of these individuals. The physician will be doing these individuals a tremendous service by performing a session of one-haired follicular units to reconstruct this crucial area. A more aesthetic harmony will thus result (Figures 14 and 15). A SYSTEM FOR GRADING TEMPORAL PEAK BALDNESSGrade A Temporal Peak BaldnessThe temporal peaks can be described as little triangular tufts of hair projecting into the lateral forehead regions bilaterally. With grade A the temporal peak region demonstrates hair that is vibrant with no signs of thinning (Figure 4). When thoroughly wetting the area with alcohol or water, there are no demonstrated signs of thinning at or behind the peak.
Likewise, if a patient presents to the hair restoration surgeon's office with type VII male pattern baldness, is wearing a hairpiece, and is also found to be a noncandidate for a full restoration, it is appropriate to suggest to that patient that he or she may want to undergo a session of one-haired follicular units to the temporal peaks and nothing else. This patient would, of course, still wear the hairpiece. This simple maneuver can transform a hairpiece from looking aesthetically unpleasing to extremely natural. SUMMARYThe author presents the normal progression of hair loss in the temporal peak regions and grades it from A to D. A method of evaluating this region is described as well as a methodology to treat. It is critical that only fine hairs be used in these reconstructions. It is the opinion of this author that the temporal peak area should be evaluated routinely to avail the best results to the patients, not only in the short term, but also in the long term. A correlation between frontal hairline placement and temporal peak placement is given. In general, the more anterior the frontal hairline, the more anterior the temporal peak reconstruction and vice-versa.REFERENCES1. Hamilton JB. Male hormone stimulation is perquisite and an incitant in common baldness. Am j Anat 1951;71:451-80.2. Hamilton JB. Patterned loss of hair in man: types and incidence. Ann NY Acad Sci 1951;53:708-28. 3. Norwood OT. Classification and incidence of male pattern baldness. In: Norwood OT, Shiell RC, eds. Hair transplant surgery, 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1984:10-13. 4. Brandy DA. A technique for hair-grafting in between existing hair follicles in patients with early pattern baldness. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26:801-5. S. Brandy DA. Dispelling the myth of high hairline in follicular unit transplantation. Dermatol Surg 2000;26:844-7. COMMENTARYDr. Brandy is to be commended for drawing attention to an area that has become increasingly important in the hair transplant plans for many of our patients. He particularly drives home the point that there has to be an aesthetic balance between the position of the transplanted front hairline and the anterior temporal hairline. I believe his grading system for the temporal peak area will be a useful way for communicating with others and documenting the status at any given time of a patient's hair in this area.In the past few years, I find that I am transplanting this anterior temporal region in approximately 30% of my male patients and in over 90% of my female patients. I think it is important to have an "age cutoff" under which one would not transplant in this area, so that extensive alopecia progression and diminished safe donor stores don't leave these transplanted hairs isolated in an awkward location with no supporting hair behind or above it. For me, this cutoff is somewhere between 35 and 40 years of age. Each surgeon develops his or her own unique approach to this area, but I agree strongly with Dr. Brandy's point to make the entry angle of the graft very acute and flat with the skin, and also the recommendation to augment the thinning hairs that are present, but not to strike out into new ground anteriorly, as this carries the risk of creating an unnatural result. The only way I differ from Dr. Brandy's approach is that I don't initially transplant with the density he does, but prefer to divide the task over 2-3 sessions so that I can make artistic touches as I watch things develop. I also routinely use some two-hair follicular units behind the front one-haired ones, as I think they provide a nice density to the work done. With coarse, dark hair I would also confine my grafts to the one-hair F.U.'s only. One final valuable tidbit: while I also love using the dark blue Pilot Marker for all of my transplant work (and in fact learned of it from Dr. Brandy many years ago), I had two females with fair white skin who developed tiny blue tattoo dots at the anterior border of the transplanted temporal hairs, caused by needle incisions through the Pilot Marker ink. These obviously needed to be punched out and closed with fine nylon sutures. Since that time, in the temple area I have always placed my Pilot Marker outline anterior to where I actually place the grafts. It is important, when showing the patient this outline, to tell him or her that the hair will be behind this line, and that the line being drawn in this way may make it look as if the hair is being transplanted further anterior than will actually be done. MICHAEL BEEHNER, MD |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1-800-429-1151 412-429-1151
FREE Video Information Kit | Online Hair Loss Evaluation | Free Evaluation With Dr. Brandy | Patient Health History Form The Brandy School for Physicians | Office Directions | Site Map | Site Pages | Related Resources | Contact Us Copyright © 2000-2008 Dominic A. Brandy, MD & Associates. All rights reserved. Disclaimer |